Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Lino Brocka


May 19, 2008, Monday, was the third death anniversary of Pilar Brocka, the mother of internationally acclaimed Filipino director Lino Brocka.

Tomorrow, May 22, 2008, is the 17th death anniversary of Lino himself.

To commemorate these events, I am posting a storyline that I wrote sometime in 1998, seven years after Lino died. This was written “on spec” (as we say in the biz, meaning, with no down payment), and was commissioned by an Asian-American festival organizer. The film, meant for international release, never got made.


Ka Pete, screenwriter, with Lino Brocka in Cannes, 1989,
when Orapronobis (Les insoumis in the French-subtitled version),
was shown out of competition.
I'm not sure now, though, if this photo was taken in Paris,
outside a theater where the film was shown commercially.


DIREK

Storyline
by
Jose F. Lacaba

WE COULD START with the car accident in 1991. On a deserted, dimly lit city road sometime after midnight, a speeding car swerves to avoid hitting a motorized tricycle that has suddenly materialized from a side street, and crashes into a lamppost. The tricycle disappears where it came from, but a passing car stops and its passengers pull out the accident victims. The man in the front passenger’s seat is obviously dead. The good Samaritans recognize him: “It’s Lino Brocka.”

Flashback to 1977. Lino Brocka, 38, is recognized as the preeminent film director of his generation. He is a child of the commercial film industry, but in the past three years he has been rebelling against the industry—and often succeeding, making highly personal low-budget independent films that have won both critical and box-office acclaim.

This same year, a Frenchman whom we shall call Jean-Paul, a sometime film director who unofficially serves as talent scout for various European film festivals, currently on the lookout for Third World and especially Asian films, comes to Manila and sees Lino’s latest picture, Insiang. The subsequent showing of the film in the Director’s Fortnight of the Cannes filmfest marks the beginning of Lino Brocka’s cult following in the festival circuit.

It is during his colorful interviews with the international press that we get glimpses of Lino’s background: he was born out of wedlock; his father got murdered by political enemies; his mother, a schoolteacher, was forced to work as a taxi dancer to support her two sons; as a boy he sold food and flowers in the streets, and sang and danced to attract customers; as a young man fresh out of college he joined the Mormons and was assigned to a leper colony in Hawaii; on his return home he worked as script supervisor on American B movies made in the Philippines.

Insiang’s Cannes premiere is also the beginning of a stormy relationship between Lino and Jean-Paul, who becomes both Pygmalion and Svengali to his “discovery.” In the next dozen years, Jean-Paul will be instrumental in bringing more than a dozen of Lino’s work to international film festivals and to the attention of international film critics. His enthusiasm for Lino’s films is undeniable. But at the same time Jean-Paul, ethnocentric despite his cosmopolitanism, wants to make sure the Brocka films will be acceptable to Western tastes. One condition for international exposure is for the films—originally made for the Filipino mass audience of peasants and proles (the Filipino elite at this time prefers Hollywood productions)—to be re-edited, trimmed to manageable length to make their pace less leisurely, and even to be re-scored, if the music is thought to be much too exotic or nativistic. On a number of occasions, Jean-Paul does the re-editing himself.


IN THE BEGINNING LINO COMPLIES with Jean-Paul’s wishes without question. Surprised, but flattered, by the international interest in his films, he is grateful to Jean-Paul for making that interest possible. Towards the end, however, already a veteran of international film festivals where he meets other directors from West and East, North and South, he begins to agonize over and be angered by the neocolonial implications of his pliancy. He is struck by something an African film director says at an international film conference: “The Western critics complain about the slow pace of my films. But what you see in my films is the pace of my country. It is the pace of Africa today.”

Lino’s international success also puts him on a collision course with the Philippine government. It is a time of martial law. When Lino’s films are shown in Cannes and in other festivals, the international film community gets to see the Manila slums that the Marcos dictatorship has taken pains to keep literally hidden behind high wooden fences, away from the prying eyes of tourists and foreign investors. Imelda Marcos, who is not only the First Lady of the country but also the governor of Metro Manila, summons Lino to Malacañang Palace, upbraids him for his obsession with slum dwellers, and urges him to make films about “the true, the good and the beautiful.” Lino agrees to direct a segment of a government-produced film about Philippine history; the film is never shown.

In 1980 Lino has a second entry in Cannes—Jaguar, the first Filipino film to be entered in competition, and perhaps the first to show the enormous garbage dump in Manila that would come to be known as Smokey Mountain. To divert attention from the film, Imelda dispatches a delegation to Cannes. It hosts a lavish “Philippine night” to which Lino is not invited, and in which Jaguar is not once mentioned. The following year, to counter the impact that Lino’s films have made in France, Imelda establishes the Manila International Film Festival. Workers rushing to build the Manila Film Palace get buried in quick-drying cement when a part of the faulty structure collapses. In order not to delay the filmfest opening, the dead are left buried in the cement; exposed limbs and torsos are simply sawed off. Afterwards, Catholic priests and shamans of ancient native religions perform exorcism rites in the film palace.

At first Lino’s resistance to the dictatorship takes the form of opposition to film and media censorship. But increasingly he is drawn to overtly political protest, joining demonstrations and organizing concerned artists against secret Marcos decrees that impose the death penalty on anyone joining anti-government demonstrations. For Lino, this is a time of living dangerously. But he is also a bundle of contradictions, and his new militancy is a source of some amusement to his associates in the theater group that he heads. They remember that not too long ago he launched a witch hunt against presumed leftists setting up clandestine anti-government cells within the theater group.

Lino’s political activity does not stop him from making movies. He is a prolific director, on two occasions making as many as five pictures a year. When his own film company goes under as a result of litigation, he evolves a strategy for survival in the highly commercial industry. He makes the box-office formula hits that the producers want him to do, always bringing them in on time and on budget. In exchange, he gets a chance to work on his own projects every now and then, taking a cut in his fee whenever necessary.

In his films he often lashes out at hypocrisy, and in his personal life he begins to shed his inhibitions and comes out of the closet. During the making of a documentary on his life, he openly proclaims his gayness for the first time. On a visit to the States, a Filipino friend of his who has contacted AIDS dies in his arms. Fearing for his life, Lino has himself tested. He gets a clean bill of health. That does not stop him, when he comes home, from frequenting the gay bars where he discovers a “macho dancer” whom he recruits into the movies. Perhaps he becomes this young man’s lover. It is this young man who is driving the car in which Lino dies.

When the exiled politician Ninoy Aquino decides to come home, Lino joins demonstrators who defy a government ban by welcoming Aquino at the airport. Lino is thus one of the very first to find out that Aquino has been assassinated—shot dead by government troops while coming down from the plane. With the Aquino assassination, the country explodes. So does Lino. Practically every day there are massive protest actions in which tens of thousands take part, and Lino is in the thick of them, delivering incendiary speeches, being tear-gassed and bludgeoned by the riot police, finally being arrested during a transport strike and incarcerated for a couple of months. Actual demonstrations are incorporated in Bayan Ko: Kapit sa Patalim (My Country: In Desperate Straits), another Brocka film that makes it to Cannes in the competition category, and government censors pounce on the film, banning it from exhibition for a number of reasons. Lino goes all the way to the Supreme Court to fight for his film, and in November of 1985, more than a year after its Cannes premiere, the Filipino audience finally gets to see it.

By this time the Marcos dictatorship is on the verge of disintegration. Barely three months later, in February of 1986, a fraudulent election encourages a military mutiny, which in turn triggers a peaceful popular uprising in which nuns stop tanks with nothing more than rosaries and flowers. Lino rushes to the barricades without hesitation. On the fourth day of the festive uprising, the dictatorship falls. Lino and his gay confreres dance in the streets.

Throughout all this, we continue to show developments in what is getting to be a love-hate relationship between Lino and Jean-Paul. There comes a point in the relationship when the Frenchman intervenes even in his protégé’s political and personal life. Wanting to cement Brocka’s reputation as a world-class director, Jean-Paul urges Lino to slow down on his political activism and cut down on his night life and concentrate on his filmmaking. There is a shouting match, and for a time Lino refuses to talk to Jean-Paul. But after the revolution, things are patched up, and Lino—who has been appointed to the Constitutional Commission by the new government of Corazon Aquino—agrees to do a film project brokered by Jean-Paul, who conceives it as the vehicle for getting Lino the long-awaited top honors at the Cannes filmfest.


BY THE TIME THE PROJECT gets going, Lino has become disenchanted with the new government he fought for. He resigns from the Constitutional Commission when he realizes it is dominated by unreconstructed landlords, loggers, militarists and the old political elite, who are working mightily to restore the oligarchic status quo ante instead of moving forward to greater democratization. Soon after, he is helping refugees displaced from a southern province by paramilitary vigilantes, getting them sanctuaries in Manila. He gets the shock of his life when one of the refugees, a woman he is escorting, is abducted right outside the Supreme Court, apparently by government agents. Lino’s disenchantment is evident in the film he makes at this time, known in the Philippines as Orapronobis. The making of this film also marks his final break with Jean-Paul.

Although shot entirely in the Philippines, Orapronobis is financed by a French company, and Jean-Paul serves as line producer, film editor, and script adviser. In this role, he intervenes in various aspects of production, ordering Lino to re-shoot scenes or replace actors, making suggestions about camera angles. Lino reaches his breaking point, yelling at Jean-Paul: “Stop making your film! This is my film!” Lino prevails upon the French producers to fire Jean-Paul. But the Frenchman, whose influence in Cannes Lino has underestimated, has the last word. Orapronobis is placed in a special out-of-competition category; Lino is therefore not in contention for any award. The Golden Palm goes to sex, lies and videotape.

The interaction of First World and Third World, colonizing power and colonial subject, is one of the main themes that could be explored in telling the story of the relationship between Lino and Jean-Paul. It is not a simplistic relationship of exploiter and exploited, oppressor and oppressed, because the native is victim and beneficiary at one and the same time, the foreigner is bully and benefactor at one and the same time, and both are consciously using and manipulating each other for each one’s personal interests and ambitions. (In a reversal of the colonial paradigm, Lino at one point even secures Philippine financing for a made-in-the-Philippines art film written and directed by Jean-Paul, who apparently cannot obtain financing for his personal projects in his own country.) At the same time, a genuine personal friendship does develop between the Pygmalion and his Galatea, before it turns sour in the end.

In the end we return to 1991. Mourners are pouring into a small university chapel and filing past Lino’s coffin to pay their last respects, the way they did when Ninoy Aquino lay in state in a cathedral. Weeping movie extras put up a streamer saying that with Lino’s death they have lost their foremost defender, the man who made sure they got fed and paid on time. Film superstars mingle with political activists. The gay community comes to the wake in full force, and the armed underground Left sends a message extolling Lino’s courage and his contribution to the liberation struggle. The supreme irony, however, is that Imelda Marcos sends flowers, but Cory Aquino, who has never forgiven Lino for walking out of her Constitutional Commission, does not.

The funeral march is a long one. It is almost like a protest march. The mourners are singing the protest song “Bayan Ko” (My Country).


THE END

Friday, May 9, 2008

Fe Flores Lacaba


FE FLORES LACABA, circa 1984,
sa edad na 18

Bilang paggunita sa Mother’s Day (second Sunday of May ang selebrasyon; May 11 ngayong 2008), gusto kong ilabas dito ang isang tulang sinulat ko tungkol sa aking ina, si Fe Flores Lacaba. Buhay pa siya nang sulatin ko ito


Ina
(Alay kay Fe Flores Lacaba, 1916-2006)


Ni Jose F. Lacaba


Nang mabalo, hindi na siya muling nag-asawa.
Hindi ko alam kung may lumigaw na ibang lalaki,
o kung inisip man lamang niya ang muling mag-asawa:
bata pa naman siya noon, kung tutuusin, at may bighani.

Pero anim ang kanyang anak: may anim siyang
bungangang pakakainin, katawang bibihisan; anim na utak
na may kanya-kanyang baltik at iba’t ibang antas
ng pang-unawa, pangangailangan at panibugho.

Wala siyang maibigay na anumang layaw o luho,
kaya walang siyang layaw o luhong ibinigay. Tiniyak
niya lamang na may bubong sila laban sa araw at ulan,
may kulambo laban sa lamok, may laman lagi ang tiyan.

At pinabayaan niyang magkapakpak at lumipad
ang anim na malayang utak. Bagamat siya’y guro,
hindi niya sinakal ng pangaral ang kanilang mga pangarap,
hindi niya inipit sa libro ang kanyang mga paruparo.

Alam kong luha ang ipinandilig niya sa kanyang hardin
at ang puso niya’y nagkasugat-sugat dahil matinik
ang mga bunga ng kanyang mapagpalayang paglingap.
Pero alam ko ring ipinagmamalaki niya ang halimuyak.

Ang tulang ito, walang borloloy at walang palabok,
ay para sa aking ina.
Sa pamamagitan man lamang ng tulang ito
ay gusto kong ipaabot ang aking pasasalamat.

(Mula sa EDAD MEDYA: Mga Tula sa Katanghaliang Gulang, Anvil Publishing, 2000)


FE FLORES LACABA, circa 1945
Kasama ang kabiyak na si Jose Monreal Lacaba Sr.,
tenyente ng USAFFE (United States Armed Forces in the Far East),
isang grupong gerilya noong Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig,
at kalong ang panganay nilang si Jose Flores Lacaba Jr.,
na ewan ko kung ano ang tinitingala sa kalangitan


Narito naman ang isang salin sa Ingles na ginawa ni Marne Kilates pagkaraang yumao ng aking ina noong Nobyembre 20, 2006.


Mother
By Jose F. Lacaba
Translated into English by Marne Kilates


Widowed, she never married.
I don’t know if any other man wooed her,
Or if she ever thought of marrying again;
She was young, and yes, good-looking.

But she had six children, six
Mouths to feed, six bodies to clothe, whose
Brains had each its own quirks and ways
Of looking at the world, its needs and jealousies.

Of luxury and comfort she had none to give.
But she made sure we had a roof over our heads
Against sun and rain; a net against mosquito
Over our beds; and that we didn’t go hungry.

And then she let our minds go free, grow
Wings and take flight. Though a teacher, she never
Bridled us with advice, or weighed down our dreams,
Or pressed them between book pages like butterflies.

I know that she watered her garden with tears
And her heart bruised, for thorny were the fruits
Of her liberating love. But she watched
Her garden thrive. She was proud.

This poem, without frill or ornament,
Is for my mother.
Only through this poem
Can I thank her.


FE FLORES LACABA, circa 1948
Kasama ang kabiyak na si Pepe (Jose Monreal Lacaba Sr.),
ang anak na panganay na si Pepito (Jose Ma. Flores Lacaba Jr.),
at ang pangalawang anak na si Gingging (Henrietta Anne Flores Lacaba)


Nang pumanaw ang aking ina ay naglabas kaming pamilya ng isang press release na obituary na inilathala naman nang buo ng ilang diyaryo. Narito ang obit:

Former schoolteacher Fe Flores Lacaba passed away at around 9 a.m. today, Nov. 20, at home in Pateros, Metro Manila, the town where she was born. She was 90.

She suffered a stroke on May 4 and had been bedridden since then, in the process developing bedsores, pneumonia, and diabetes.

She is survived by her children Jose, Henrietta Malillin, Erlinda Echanis, Antonio, and Virgilio. Her third child, Emmanuel, died in 1976, and her husband, World War II veteran Jose Monreal Lacaba Sr., left her widowed in 1958.

A graduate of Philippine Normal College, Mrs. Lacaba taught Pilipino and other subjects at all levels in various schools, including Ateneo de Cagayan (now Xavier University) and Lourdes College in Cagayan de Oro City, and Colegio del Buen Consejo and Pasig Catholic College in Pasig City.

She was a soft-spoken woman who nevertheless raised strong-willed children, four of whom--including award-winning writers Jose (Pete) and Emmanuel (Eman)--were prisoners of conscience during and immediately after martial law.

Eman, who joined the armed resistance during the martial-law dictatorship, was captured alive after an encounter in Davao but “salvaged” later in the day. It was Mrs. Lacaba who, with the help of the late poet Alfrredo Navarro Salanga, recovered Eman's body from a mass grave in Mindanao.

Three of Mrs. Lacaba's children-in-law were also political detainees, and a son-in-law was killed in the early years of martial law.

The wake is at the Garden of Memories memorial park on Kalsadang Bago, Pateros, Metro Manila, near the boundary of Taguig City. Interment will be announced later.

Monday, April 28, 2008

JONAS BURGOS AT ANG MGA NAWAWALA


Noong Abril 28, 2007, eksaktong isang taon na ngayon ang nakararaan, dinukot si Jonas Burgos ng ilang di-kilalang lalaki habang nanananghalian sa isang restoran sa Ever Gotesco Mall, Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. Hanggang ngayon ay hindi pa siya lumilitaw o inililitaw. Walang nakakaalam—maliban na lang siguro sa mga dumukot sa kanya—kung siya’y buhay pa o patay na. Kabilang na siya ngayon sa lumalaking hanay ng mga desaparecido sa Pilipinas.

(For more info on Jonas Burgos, check out http://freejonasburgosmovement.blogspot.com.)

Hindi ko yata nakilala o nakadaupang-palad si Jonas, pero nakilala ko at nakasama sa trabaho ang kanyang mga magulang—ang kapwa peryodistang si Joe Burgos at ang kabiyak niyang si Edith, na kung hindi ako nagkakamali ay siyang namahala sa business side ng mga peryodikong itinatag at pinagmatnugutan ni Joe. Nagsulat ako ng kolum para sa dalawa sa mga peryodikong iyon, ang We Forum at ang Tinig ng Masa.

Mula Enero 2001 hanggang Mayo 2007, ayon sa human-rights group na Karapatan, 199 na ang naging biktima ng enforced disappearances sa Pilipinas. Isang di-inaasahang side effect ng pangayayaring ito, para sa akin, bilang manunulat, ay ang pagka-revive ng isa kong lumang tula na sinulat noong panahon pa ng batas militar.

Ito ang tulang “Ang mga Nawawala,” na nalathala sa libro kong Sa Panahon ng Ligalig (Anvil Publishing, 1991) at muling nalathala sa isa ko pang libro, Kung Baga sa Bigas: Mga Piling Tula (University of the Philippines Press, 2002, second printing 2005). Ilang beses na itong binabasa ngayon sa ilang pagtitipon na may kinalaman sa karapatang-tao. Na-reprint na rin ito sa website ng Free Jonas Burgos Movement (http://freejonasburgosmovement.blogspot.com/2007_06_06_archive.html).


Para namang pinagtiyap, habang hinahanap ko ang mga tula kong Ingles na ekphrasis, o tungkol sa painting, nahalungkat ko ang clipping ng tulang “Ang mga Nawawala.” At nadiskubre kong may one degree of separation lang pala ang tulang ito kay Jonas Burgos.

Nakalimutan ko na, pero ang tula ko tungkol sa mga desaparecido ay kauna-unahang nalathala sa kolum ko sa diyaryong We Forum, na ang editor at publisher ay ang ama ni Jonas.

Narito ang kolum ko sa weekend edition ng We Forum na may petsang June 28-30, 1985:


KUNG TUTUUSIN
Jose F. Lacaba

May lumabas na balita nitong nakaraang linggo tungkol sa 12 peryodista at komentaristang Pilipino na napatay o naglaho mula noong Enero 1984. Sumulat kay Presidente Marcos ang Komite para sa Pagtatanggol ng mga Peryodista, isang grupong nakabase sa New York, para ihingi ng katarungan ang 12 napatay o naglaho. Habang binabasa ko ang ulat ay naalala ko si Henry Romero, peryodista ng Taliba at Bulletin Today, na tulad kong may panahong nanirahan sa Pateros. Nawala’t sukat si Henry may 10 tao na ang nakararaan, at hanggang ngayon ay nawawala pa, at iniisip ko sanang sumulat ng isang kolum tungkol sa kanya at tungkol sa iba pang kilala kong nawawala, pero sa halip na kolum ay tula ang lumabas, ang tulang matutunghayan ninyo ngayon:


ANG MGA NAWAWALA

Isang araw sila’y
nawala na lang at sukat.
May hindi pumasok sa opisina,
hindi sumipot sa apoyntment,
nang-indiyan ng kadeyt.
May hindi umuwi ng bahay
at hindi nakasalo
ng pamilya sa hapunan,
hindi nakasiping ng kabiyak.
Ang inihaing ulam ay ligalig,
at ang inilatag na banig
ay ayaw dalawin ng antok.

Nang hanapin sila’y
walang masabi
ang kamag-anak at kaibigan,
walang ulat ang pulisya,
walang malay ang militar.
Kung mayroon mang nakakita
nang sila’y sunggaban
ng malalaking lalaki
at isakay sa dyip o kotse,
pabulong-bulong ang saksi,
palinga-linga,
at kung pakikiusapang
tumestigo sa korte,
baka ito’y tumanggi.

Pagkaraan ng ilang araw,
o linggo, o buwan, o taon,
pagkaraan ng maraming
maghapon at magdamag,
pagkaraang ang agam-agam
ay magparoo’t parito
sa mga manhid na pasilyo
at ang pag-aasam-asam
ay mapanis sa mga tanggapan,
pagkaraan ng luha’t tiyaga,
ang ilan sa kanila’y
muling lumitaw.

Lumitaw sila
sa bilangguan, sa bartolina,
sa kubling bahay na imbakan
ng ungol, tili at panaghoy,
himpilan ng mga berdugong
eksperto sa sanlibo’t isang
istilo ng pagpapahirap.
Lumitaw silang
bali ang buto o sira ang bait.
O kaya’y lumitaw silang
lumulutang sa mabahong ilog,
o nakahandusay sa pampang,
o umaalingasaw
sa mga libingang mababaw
na hinukay ng mga asong gala.
Lumitaw silang
may gapos ang kamay at paa
na wala nang pintig, o watak-
watak ang kamay, paa, ulo,
o tadtad ng butas ang bangkay,
likha ng bala o balaraw.

Ang iba’y hindi na lumitaw,
hindi na kailanman lumitaw,
nawala na lang at sukat,
walang labí, walang bangkay,
hindi malaman kung
buhay o patay,
hindi mapaghandugan
ng lamayan, pasiyam, luksa,
hindi maipagbabang-luksa,
hindi maipagtirik ng kandila
kung Todos los Santos.
Nakaposas pa ba sila
sa paa ng kinakalawang na kama
sa loob ng kuwartong may tanod,
busog sa bugbog,
binabagabag ng bangungot,
sumisipol kung nag-iisa
ng “Saan Ka Man Naroroon,”
iniisip kung ano ang iniisip
ng magulang at anak,
kasintahan o kabiyak?
O sila ba’y
umayaw na sa pakikibaka
at nagbalik sa dating buhay,
o nagtaksil sa simulain
at nagtatago sa takot,
o nag-asawang muli
at nangibang-bayan,
o tinamaan ng amnisya
at lalaboy-laboy sa lansangan,
o lihim na namundok
at nag-iba ng pangalan?
O sila ba’y
pinagpapasasaan na ng uod?
Nag-ugat na ba ang talahib
sa mga mata ng kanilang bungo?
Bahagi na ba sila
ng kanilang lupang tinubuan,
ang lupang kanilang ipinaglaban?

Sinusulat ko ito
para sa mga kakilalang
hanggang ngayon ay nawawala,
para kina Charlie del Rosario
at Caloy Tayag
at Manny Yap
at Henry Romero
at Jun Flores
at Rudy Romano,
sila na kahit hindi ko
nakilala nang husto
ay alam kong naglingkod
sa api at hikahos.
Buhay man sila o patay,
sa aking alaala’y
mananatili silang buhay.

Saturday, April 19, 2008

EKPHRASIS: Seurat, Botticelli

Sa isang nakaraang post, may petsang Pebrero 19, 2008, nabanggit ko na may mga nasulat na akong mga tula tungkol sa painting na “Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte” ni Georges Seurat at “Birth of Venus” ni Sandro Botticelli, pero ‘kako ay kailangan ko munang halukayin ang luma kong files para sa mga tulang iyan.

Eto na, nahalukay at na-recover ko na.

Parehong circa early 1960s pa nasulat ang mga ito, noong nagsusulat
pa ako ng tula sa Ingles, and more than 40 years before I even heard
the word "ekphrasis," the term for poems about the visual arts or artistic objects.

Ang "La Grande Jatte," tungkol sa painting ni Georges Seurat, ay
nalathala sa Heights Magazine ng Ateneo de Manila. Kung hindi ako
nagkakamali ay si Gemino "Jimmy" Abad ang nagbigay sa akin ng
photocopy ng tula kong ito, na nakalimutan ko nang sinulat ko. In
fact, si Jimmy ang pinagkakautangan ko ng photocopies ng maraming
tula ko sa Ingles, na ang karamihan ay naibaon ko na sa limot, pero
nahalukay niya noong gumawa siya ng research para sa kanyang
groundbreaking anthology na A Habit of Shores: Filipino Poetry and
Verse from English, '60s to the '90s (1999).

Ang "Birth of Venus," tungkol sa painting ni Sandro Botticelli," ay
sinulat noong i-ban ng Post Office from the mails ang issue ng
Philippines Free Press na nag-reproduce sa painting na ito bilang
ilustrasyon sa isang editorial. Nagkataong may naitago akong
makinilyadong kopya ng tulang ito. Hindi ko maalala kung na-publish
ito at all, pero alam kong hindi pa ako nagtatrabaho sa Free Press
nang mangyari ang Post Office banning. (Unfortunately, this second
poem only makes sense if you know the "historical" background.) Ang
naalala ko ay si Fernando "Butch" Zialcita, ang predecessor ko bilang
presidente ng Ateneo Arts Club, ang nagpadala sa akin ng postcard na
nasa loob ng envelope.





















"Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte"
By Jose F. Lacaba

It seems the French have Sunday afternoons
Static, and under certain moods I find it
Enviable, to recline on the grass away from
Urban banter, pipe in mouth, or to sit
Silent in the shade, with umbrella in the sun,
Gazing at placid boats afloat without
The hurry of a destination. A trombone
Plays, but like lovers walking makes no shout,
Its music floats almost unnoticed, except
By a girl skipping alone, among people
Strolling nobly: she makes no trouble, left
To herself. No one, I am sure, will ogle
Though the ladies are supple for all to see.
A dog will not even bother to bark at a monkey.



















"The Birth of Venus" Uncensored

By Jose F. Lacaba

A postcard in an envelope is rather
Unusual, but if the postcard is
The Birth of Venus, it's understandable.
A friend, touring Florence, had seen her,
A naked newborn babe striding the foam
While a corporeal wind blows roses
All around her. Ecstatic, he sent me
Wistful envy. It is true she beguiles,
She enchants like a witch, not even from
A reproduction can the fact be hid.

I smile at the ruse of the envelope:
We live, alas, in a land that cannot stand
Sorcery of any sort, always ready
With the thick red cloak and exorcisms
To counteract the charm and break the spell.
We choose the future husband at the anvil
As our muse, and we would see the goddess
Banned, for she will give us love, and that
Is an embarrassing thing, so old-fashioned.